Operator classes
- class autolyap.problemclass.MaximallyMonotone[source]
Bases:
_OperatorInterpolationConditionOperator interpolation condition for maximally monotone operators.
Let \(G: \calH \rightrightarrows \calH\) be maximally monotone.
Interpolation inequality:
For any \((x_{r_1},u_{r_1}),(x_{r_2},u_{r_2}) \in \operatorname{gra} G\),
\[\langle u_{r_1} - u_{r_2}, x_{r_1} - x_{r_2} \rangle \ge 0.\]Matrix/vector form used in Interpolation conditions:
With an interpolation vector \(z\) built from the stacked variables in the inequality above, the same condition is encoded as
\[\mathcal{Q}\p{M, z} \le 0,\]with
\[\begin{split}M = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.\end{split}\]
This condition has no parameters.
References
[BC17, Theorem 20.21].
- class autolyap.problemclass.StronglyMonotone(
- mu: int | float,
Bases:
_OperatorInterpolationConditionOperator interpolation condition for strongly and maximally monotone operators.
Let \(\mu \in \mathbb{R}_{++}\) and \(G: \calH \rightrightarrows \calH\) be \(\mu\)-strongly monotone.
Interpolation inequality:
For any \((x_{r_1},u_{r_1}),(x_{r_2},u_{r_2}) \in \operatorname{gra} G\),
\[\langle u_{r_1} - u_{r_2}, x_{r_1} - x_{r_2} \rangle \ge \mu \|x_{r_1} - x_{r_2}\|^2.\]Matrix/vector form used in Interpolation conditions:
With an interpolation vector \(z\) built from the stacked variables in the inequality above, the same condition is encoded as
\[\mathcal{Q}\p{M, z} \le 0,\]with
\[\begin{split}M = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} 2\mu & -2\mu & -1 & 1 \\ -2\mu & 2\mu & 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.\end{split}\]
Parameters
mu (
Union[int,float]): The strong monotonicity parameter corresponding to \(\mu\) (must be \(> 0\) and finite).
Raises
ValueError: If mu is not a number, \(\le 0\), or infinite.
References
[RTBG20, Proposition 1].
- class autolyap.problemclass.LipschitzOperator(
- L: int | float,
Bases:
_OperatorInterpolationConditionOperator interpolation condition for Lipschitz operators.
Let \(L \in \mathbb{R}_{++}\) and \(G: \calH \to \calH\) be \(L\)-Lipschitz continuous.
Interpolation inequality:
For any \(x_{r_1}, x_{r_2} \in \calH\) with \(u_{r_1} = G(x_{r_1})\) and \(u_{r_2} = G(x_{r_2})\),
\[\|u_{r_1} - u_{r_2}\|^2 \le L^2 \|x_{r_1} - x_{r_2}\|^2.\]Matrix/vector form used in Interpolation conditions:
With an interpolation vector \(z\) built from the stacked variables in the inequality above, the same condition is encoded as
\[\mathcal{Q}\p{M, z} \le 0,\]with
\[\begin{split}M = \begin{bmatrix} -L^2 & L^2 & 0 & 0 \\ L^2 & -L^2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.\end{split}\]
Parameters
Raises
ValueError: If L is not a number, \(\le 0\), or infinite.
References
- class autolyap.problemclass.Cocoercive(
- beta: int | float,
Bases:
_OperatorInterpolationConditionOperator interpolation condition for cocoercive operators.
Let \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}_{++}\) and \(G: \calH \to \calH\) be \(\beta\)-cocoercive.
Interpolation inequality:
For any \(x_{r_1}, x_{r_2} \in \calH\) with \(u_{r_1} = G(x_{r_1})\) and \(u_{r_2} = G(x_{r_2})\),
\[\langle u_{r_1} - u_{r_2}, x_{r_1} - x_{r_2} \rangle \ge \beta \|u_{r_1} - u_{r_2}\|^2.\]Matrix/vector form used in Interpolation conditions:
With an interpolation vector \(z\) built from the stacked variables in the inequality above, the same condition is encoded as
\[\mathcal{Q}\p{M, z} \le 0,\]with
\[\begin{split}M = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 & 2\beta & -2\beta \\ 1 & -1 & -2\beta & 2\beta \end{bmatrix}.\end{split}\]
Parameters
beta (
Union[int,float]): The cocoercivity parameter corresponding to \(\beta\) (must be \(> 0\) and finite).
Raises
ValueError: If beta is not a number, \(\le 0\), or infinite.
References
[RTBG20, Proposition 2].
- class autolyap.problemclass.WeakMintyVariationalInequality(
- rho_minty: int | float,
Bases:
_OperatorInterpolationConditionOperator interpolation condition for operators that fulfill the weak Minty variational inequality.
Let \(\rho_{\textup{minty}} \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(G: \calH \rightrightarrows \calH\) satisfy a weak Minty variational inequality.
Interpolation inequality:
There exists \(x_\star \in \calH\) with \(0 \in G(x_\star)\) such that for any \((x_{r_1},u_{r_1}) \in \operatorname{gra} G\),
\[\langle u_{r_1}, x_{r_1} - x_\star \rangle \ge \rho_{\textup{minty}} \|u_{r_1}\|^2.\]Matrix/vector form used in Interpolation conditions:
With an interpolation vector \(z\) built from the stacked variables in the inequality above, the same condition is encoded as
\[\mathcal{Q}\p{M, z} \le 0,\]with
\[\begin{split}M = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 2\rho_{\textup{minty}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.\end{split}\]
Parameters
rho_minty (
Union[int,float]): The weak MVI parameter corresponding to \(\rho_{\textup{minty}}\) (must be finite).
Raises
ValueError: If rho_minty is not a number or not finite.
Note
When used inside
InclusionProblem, the problem must have exactly one component. In the notation of 3. Algorithm representation, \(m = 1\), \(m_{\textup{op}} = 1\), and \(m_{\textup{func}} = 0\). This single component may still contain a list of operator conditions (an intersection).
References
Heinz H. Bauschke and Patrick L. Combettes. Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces. Springer International Publishing, 2017. ISBN 9783319483115. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5.
M. Kirszbraun. Über die zusammenziehende und Lipschitzsche transformationen. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 22(1):77–108, 1934.
Ernest K. Ryu, Adrien B. Taylor, Carolina Bergeling, and Pontus Giselsson. Operator splitting performance estimation: Tight contraction factors and optimal parameter selection. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 30(3):2251–2271, January 2020. doi:10.1137/19m1304854.
F. A. Valentine. On the extension of a vector function so as to preserve a Lipschitz condition. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 49(2):100–108, 1943.
F. A. Valentine. A Lipschitz condition preserving extension for a vector function. American Journal of Mathematics, 67(1):83–93, January 1945. doi:10.2307/2371917.